mflowers

I want anyone big from X-Men series, LOTR/Hobbit and Planet of the Apes Hugh Jackman I would pay for in an instant, he's Wolverine, makes him amazing already xD

If that happened i would buy tickets in an instant probably

Still no Natalie Dormer refunds for me :/

I think the exclusive "package" for guests would work (on A list guests etc.) Like JAMES FRANCO ) I think it would have to be good priced perhaps up to £20 higher as it would give you a certain chance to meet them. I understand the concerns on the issue but i do think it would be more beneficial as people would be able to decide if they want to take a risk or not for less money or have no risk and more money cost etc.)

When I saw Serkis performance again I really felt in with him, the performance was spectacular, I really hope SM can bring some of the Actors in the motion Capture from the Planet of the Apes films. I think the Oscars should start recognising it, I agree with Bumper tha perhaps it should be a seperate category, but should it be? Is motion capture right to be in regular acting? After all what do we class as an actor?

So I was reading recently with Andy Serkis and him not getting Oscars because Motion Capture isn't seen as acting. With Dawn of the Planet of the Apes out it got me thinking and I wondered what you all thought, are the people who are motion captured actors or not? I personally think Motion Capture is acting as their facial expressions etc.) are important in making you feel more for the characters. What do you all think?

I posted it in the wrong section by accident

It's one of the best films I have ever seen, I was so attached to the characters and the scenes generally had an impact. Return of the King was my favourite but Dawn has I think overtaken it possibly even my favourite of all time now What did you all think of it?

You can hold whatever opinion you want but every opinion you seem to hold is the opposite of the overwhlming majority on this forum but coincidentily all those opinions favour showmasters. and when those opposing opinions are hid from view it is hard to think we are being heard. Of all the problems last weekend do you not notice that i am not criticising sm, big cons beget big problems and i have said multiple times that i give the benifit of the doubt that sm will get it right in the future. Plus i have always stated that i enjoy the events. but you argue that censoring the views of sm customers is right, you state that raising prices and creating new tiers of tickets is right, you continuingly state that having concerns and criticisms is "making trouble" that repeatedly asking for clarification to questions that go unanwsered is "making trouble" and grounds for post removal and even account banning. How can any free thinking person think that is a corect strategy for any company to take. I have never, not once swore or insulted anyone on these forums and yet the other day you refeered to me as "peope like yourself causing trouble" just because i thought customers deserved to have their concerns left in view. Is anything i have said to you that bad reeally? i think no yet you are continuously sly and dismissive to me in your anwsers. I can tell that you think i am "making trouble" when all i am doing is ssupporting what 100s of thousands af men and women died fighting to give us- a free country with right of reply and yet that will no doubt end with my account being suspended because sm don't want to hear it. Why do people need to bring up the "I have a right because people died for it". It seriously takes things too far, this is not some Nazi forum or some pro-political forum. This is SM forum, they can do what they want in regards to censorship you make it sound like they have no freedom of speech here, yet there are complaints unbanned on the forum's still, sure we may not like all of how they censor but if you don't like it either make your own forum or accept SM forum. I may be going off topic but it seriously grinds me when people use the soldier excuse in an argument. Rant Over

I don't think prices should go up, just to limit the number of visitors. That could more easily be done by limiting the number of people allowed a VT. But a special Ticket like what Jason mentioned would guarantee meeting the guest, therefore I think a ticket like that justifies a higher price. After all for example with Stan Lee, I'm sure there would be less unhappy people if perhaps he had a special VIP ticket that guaranteed meeting him as people would know that if they didn't have that ticket then there is a fair chance they wouldn't be able to meet him. Also any profit made might be used to improve the ever, eg LED lights or ability to pay A list guests upfront to entice them to attend. I'm sure SM use the profits wisely

I don't think prices should go up, just to limit the number of visitors. That could more easily be done by limiting the number of people allowed a VT. But a special Ticket like what Jason mentioned would guarantee meeting the guest, therefore I think a ticket like that justifies a higher price. After all for example with Stan Lee, I'm sure there would be less unhappy people if perhaps he had a special VIP ticket that guaranteed meeting him as people would know that if they didn't have that ticket then there is a fair chance they wouldn't be able to meet him.

I agree with David, While i myself am in education, i have a small part time job. I dont see why prices should not increase on A type Guests, i understand that people want it "fair" but sadly the world doesnt work like that. At the end of the day guests are preferences, for example person X might value Tony Blair's autograph at £100 while B at £50. Attendees can decide who they would prefer but i feel that if prices are higher (although not massive) then perhaps more people could see said guest because Queues are shorter so less time consumed through queueing etc.) This is my personal opinion and i would support to an extent any decision made if i feel its "in my interest" (after all the changes are only important to how they affect YOU)

No, they were just signed.

My Two Stan Lee autographs arrived today, now to give them to the people i ordered them for :)

Please read the response I had edited, I missed part of the reply by the pre orders :)

I would like to know as well, I ordered 2 Stan Lee's for people as I wouldn't be able to meet Stan on the day as I was meeting other guests

I would support this idea

"To Michael, Good to meet you Bud. " then his Autograph/ Signature From Milo Ventimiglia "To Michael, Best Wishes" David Wenham

I will try and update this tomorrow morning I will begin from Post #10 tomorrow

Hi Guys, I didn't expect this quick of a response which is amazing :), I'm going to keep updating when I can so it might take a while but I will make posts when I get more added to the top, don't worry I will add them all ASAP

Posts #4 and 5 added Will add the rest after dinner :)

Post #2 added

I thought this could be a very useful way of helping SM see all positives and negatives that people felt. Instead of arguing with each other and lets face it going off-topic at points, please post all your positives and negatives just once. I will copy and Past below all posted by users with a number count to show how many people have said each. Please lets keep this on topic as im sure everyone would like SM to be able to see all things about their event to move forward. I will post mine and please post yours below so i can add them to the first post Positives Variety of Guests (4) Price of Autographs (1) High Quality Guests (5) Gold Pass Entry time (1) Crew in Clashes (1) Stalls (3) Crew at photo shoot A *and on Sunday* (2) Crew at photo shoot E on Saturday (1) Crew on VQ autographs (2) YALC (2) Waterstones at YALC (1) Photo shoot queuing (1) Prop Photo Shoots (3) Gold Room (1) Extra Stan Lee Signing (3) Comic Zone (1) Stan Lee Talk (1) Sunday improvements (1) Friday Night Preview (2) Crew (4) SM Twitter (3) Too Tall FAQ Post (2) Price Value (1) Auction Items (1) Retro Gaming Area (1) Amount of Stalls (1) Cos players (1) Entry Time for Early Bird early queuing (1) Photo Shoot Variety (1) Photo Shoot Locations (1) Photo Shoots (In General) (1) Location of areas for each activity in LFCC (1) Negatives Overcrowding (6) Posters at sales desk weren't updated when a guest had sold out (1) Misuse of Space (1) Entry into Venue (1) YALC squashed at the back (1) YALC queues blending into regular queues (1) Queue Jumpers (2) Having to go out and in between Venues (1) Queues in general (1) Lack of Updates on the website or Social Media (1) Queue management for autographs (1) Photo shoot queuing (1) Trailer Fest (2) Comic Awards (1) Changing of Firedoors (1) Book Signings (1) Heat *addressed by Jason* (2) Under staffing (1) Female toilet access Crew (3) Crew Member visibility *Sunday* (1) Lack of information for queue (1) Sound Quality of Talks (1) Giveaway Confusion (1) Lack of queue barriers (1) Crew lack of knowledge on certain aspects/ miss communication (3) Lack of organisation/signage (3) Programmes/ Giveaway (Where were they? selling locations) (3) Aisles (1) Access to Stalls (1) Seating (1) Bins (2) GOT Screening Surprise guest (1) Ticket Selling Locations (1) Layout (Claustrophobic layout) (1) Gmail and Hotmail registration unavailability on forums (2) Gold Pass Room (1) Bigger Signage for important parts of the show eg.) Organisers booth VQ tickets etc.) (2) Crew Attitude (1) Possibility of not getting back in due to high numbers of people inside (1) Please Post yours and i will add them to the list

Hi Jason, Thanks for the post, i had a wonderful time and although it was busy i like the ideas you have suggested. The fact that bigger guests are getting available and is great, i like the idea of special packages as well. Perhaps as well Friday could be made a full day, this could make things more spread out over the weekend perhaps? Thanks for this years event and i am looking forward to future events and seeing how LFCC grows from now.

I guess I didn't win any auctions then