What I was getting at was that a whole page had gone by since she made the post yet you still dragged it up again by replying with the same old 'record' that they have already been replied with.
Fair enough. But we're not all on the internet 24/7 and unfortunately in the last two pages Owlpost1992's charmless and entitled comment does rather stand out. Not everyone who is attending the Hub can make Collectormania - as Morgan pointed out there are plenty of people coming from overseas and John's cancellation is even more unfortunate as it comes on the heels of a complete debacle of a US con which he couldn't attend and was due to be the star attraction at. I'm sure some of my friends coming from overseas would be delighted to be in Owlpost's position of having another opportunity to see him less than a month later.
Am I happy that John has cancelled the event? No.
But people need to make the decision to move on and not whine about it anymore or not go.
So it wasn't really about her but more along the lines of the blatant hypocrisy of your post.
Kindly explain what in my post was "blatantly hypocritical".
For it to have been hypocritical I would have had to be criticising Owlpost 1992 for constantly looking for an additional benefit at the event (ie James Marsters becoming an unsponsored guest) whilst simultaneously doing the exact thing myself. That would be hypocrisy. As it is I'm perfectly happy with the package available as we have more guests at this event than any other Massive Events is putting on. The event is excellent value for money.
Edited by Persephone1, 06 October 2009 - 10:09 PM.