showmasters, on Oct 21 2008, 01:04 PM, said:
"If flash is only going to be allowed for 1-2 minutes, then that is what should be said on the website"
we it did say this on the site, but as we put in very good lighting for the stage there was no need for flash photografy and as it is very hard on the guests and as we all want them to do more stage stuff this i think worked well, we do not stop people taking photos so just take the flash off (and we will amend the web site)
*snip*
"Cocktail party was horribly crowded and such a shame there's nowhere to sit down"
well i worked the party and all the main people worked it to make it work well we were there to see every one got to meet the guests we were all there and if any one had a issues at this party then i wish that thay would had come up and say at the time , as what i said at the opening seromy we cannot fix things after the event so do say if you have an issue, i must say i did not see any one that was unhappy at the time or after the party and i have lots of people say it was great ,so i think this went very well.
*snip*
Next year we also plan to have an organizers panel at the end of the event so you can ask us questions at the event and we can learn what you liked and dislikes over the weekend
*snip*
thank you all so much
yours
jason and the crew
Thank you for taking the trouble to feedback to us so quickly. Just going to address a few of the points I mentioned (not all, don't worry!)
Re. flash photography. I don't recall seeing anywhere on the website the 1-2 minutes but it is good you will be changing things in future so no one ends up being as immensely disappointed as I was by this. Not what I thought I had booked! I do disagree in thinking that 5 minutes flash would be too much for (most) guests to cope with and am very, very sad to see to read this. Heck, I'd be just about happy with 3 minutes but this is just way too short! The most severely resticted flash time limits I know about elsewhere are 5 minutes (with most allowing 10 -15, if restricted at all). This has
beyond disappointed me as I rather fear Chevron 7.2 will now be my last ME event (unless you ever get a decent selection of SGA guests again). There is no way I'm going to pay for Gold if all I get is 90 odd seconds, which would traslate to maybe 4 or 5 photos with no guarantees that any one of them would be good (for example, none of the ones I took of JB at the weekend were what I would consider any good, despite the fact that I sat on the first row and used a dSLR with external flash). Just pointing and shooting and hoping for the best doesn't work for me

Heck, I'd pay the extra money for the Gold ticket without the party, photos etc. if it meant I got a seat at/near the front and 5 minutes or more of decent flash photo time! And I'm not exaggerating there! The opportunity to get good shots in a legal, non-obtrusive way where actors are expecting it means
that much to me.
Re. the Coktail Party. It wasn't an 'issue' with that cocktail party, rather a suggestion as to how it might be further improved

Things got a little squashed and hot and you did help alleviate things by opening some doors but there wasn't much else that could have been done there and then hence we didn't feel the need to say anything as we knew we could voice suggestions on this forum. I'm thinking more for people I know who are coming to Chevron 7.2 and one of them has a mobility issue and standing around for at least an hour like that with nowhere to sit would be very difficult for them.
Re. the Organisers' Panel. Excellent idea!

It is nice to see that you are willing to listen to us, even if we may not like what comes from it !