changes
#1
Posted 06 October 2005 - 01:42 PM
Maybe it's because by the time the event actually arrives there are only one or two people I actually want to meet. This time I felt so disillusioned that I only met one person, Summer Glau, and I hadn't intended to meet her when going! I decided against meeting Andy Hallett after the Buffy/ Angel talk, I just figured he wasn't worth it, although it was quite funny watching him during the talk.
Maybe it's because the first time is always the best, because you don't know what to expect, and you enjoy the atmosphere more.
Maybe it's because you aren't allowed to take photos of half the guests, and if crew even see a camera they jump down your throat (not all the time but I've had that experience). I need photos, I take pictures of everything, my camera practically lives in my bag, and to have the ability to capture the excitement I feel at meeting a guest taken away from me means I'd rather not pay the money to even bother.
Maybe it's because I don't pay money for the autograph, I pay money to be able to say hi to the guest and maybe have a short conversation (if I can get words out, I'm not very good with nerves. I can sit next to a guest for a whole day and chat, but going up for an autograph my heart starts to race, silly) and with the more popular guests I've felt herded through the queue and barely even made eye contact I was rushed through so quickly (I'm particularly remembering the first time I met Nicholas Brenden (C6?) and meeting Tony Head and Alexis Denisof at C7, although both managed to be lovely in the brief seconds I saw them). So for me, it's not always worth it.
Maybe it's because I find a lot of the crew members annoying, up themselves, and displaying such a lack of customer service I wonder why they're allowed contact with the public (I work in customer service and I'm good at it, it's not difficult), but this could be to do with the age of some. Trying not to be nasty because I've met lovely crew members who are brilliant at what they do, but still, some...
Anyway, i'll stop now as I could carry on thinking about it all day and then I'd never get out of the office. Does anyone else have thoughts on the matter, preferably constructive?
On a side note, I'm going to see Common Rotation this evening, anyone else going?
I heart Sayid + Sawyer
Imaginary peanut butter *sigh*
Future guests, pleeease:
Amanda Tapping
Richard Dean Anderson
#2
Posted 06 October 2005 - 01:48 PM
Well done
#3
Posted 06 October 2005 - 02:12 PM
I remember then I got to talk to a lot of guests without paying for an autograph, I got to have photos with them etc - these were the quiet ones who had the open queues.
Now people can't do that really, not with many if ANY guests. Photos are often not allowed for the bigger guests, which is one of the main disappointments for me personally because I love the photos.
For me, while I've wanted to meet the bigger guests, time and again those lesser known ones have proved to be the friendliest and most approachable ones, and the ones that have stuck in my mind after the event. I've had the time to talk to them, rather than just a 3 second William Shatner "meet" if you can classify it as that.
We all go for different reasons. Some people couldn't care less about talking to the guest, while others really want to. It's a hard balance to achieve and while they want to get through as many people as possible, a lot of people are often left disappointed with their experience.
As for the crew, I do think things are improving there and not only are the crew themselves learning from it but those in charge are too through feedback etc.
I do still enjoy it a lot, don't get me wrong, but it's for totally different reasons than those that originally attracted me to the event in the first place. It's always going to be a SIGNING event predominantly, considering where it is and the nature of the event, which means it probably won't ever change.
Hopefully people can still find enjoyment in attending though. I certainly get mine through crewing and being able to see all those who come having a good time and being surrounded by like-minded people with similar interests. That's always going to appeal to me.
http://twitter.com/DavidBedwell
Long signatures mean you're going to Hell.
#4
Posted 06 October 2005 - 02:22 PM
I don't think I'll go again as a member of the public, I'd rather crew the event. Then, as you say, you get to see the enjoyment of other people. Although I've only crewed once for LFCC2 I enjoyed that far more than either of the events I've been to since. Maybe that's the problem, one crewing experience and going as a 'customer' is ruined forever!
I heart Sayid + Sawyer
Imaginary peanut butter *sigh*
Future guests, pleeease:
Amanda Tapping
Richard Dean Anderson
#5
Posted 06 October 2005 - 02:28 PM
Jestive, on Oct 6 2005, 02:42 PM, said:
I agree with a couple of your points and disagree with others (as is the nature of life) but I wanted to comment on this particular bit. I remember you wanted to crew the last Collectormania and if I remember right you did actually crew the last LFCC (forgive me if I am wrong). If you think alot of the crew are annoying and up themselves why on Earth did you want to work with them? Surely we can't be that bad if you want to join us
#6
Posted 06 October 2005 - 02:31 PM
jennylouise, on Oct 6 2005, 02:28 PM, said:
Jestive, on Oct 6 2005, 02:42 PM, said:
I agree with a couple of your points and disagree with others (as is the nature of life) but I wanted to comment on this particular bit. I remember you wanted to crew the last Collectormania and if I remember right you did actually crew the last LFCC (forgive me if I am wrong). If you think alot of the crew are annoying and up themselves why on Earth did you want to work with them? Surely we can't be that bad if you want to join us
Well there are enough crew members to be able to avoid the ones that are annoying, although they're usually only annoying to the public, and not other crew. Plus if people who have good customer experience get put off by the ones without then it would never get any better! :)
EDIT: I only crewed once at LFCC2, not at the last one.
Edited by Jestive, 06 October 2005 - 02:32 PM.
I heart Sayid + Sawyer
Imaginary peanut butter *sigh*
Future guests, pleeease:
Amanda Tapping
Richard Dean Anderson
#7
Posted 06 October 2005 - 02:50 PM
i love all sm events and i will always love them i am sure but it is for an entirely different reason. i go to see friends. i go to meet new people and most importantly i think i go to be part of the team. being part of the crew is such a big deal for me. i love it. i really do.
as to the crew being offensive... im not going to defend those that are, but i must stand up for the good crew members that happen to be under 30. we do exist! so many people believe that because someone is young they are not capable of doing a good job and it simply isnt true. i know a lor of very good, young crew members that are just as capable, and in some cases more capable, than some of the older members. of course the reverse is also true and there are always exceptions to every rule. but please try to not generalise. its not fair.
=x=
"i couldnt leave him. not there!"
All was well.
=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=
#8
Posted 06 October 2005 - 03:16 PM
CM8 was the first time I have gone properly and thought that because i was there because i wanted to be that buzz would be bigger but it didnt seem to be. It was as though there was more of a bad atmosphere with some of the people that were there. I did notice at one point that there seemed to be more notices up above some of the guests saying no pictures, then there were guests allowing photos.
This to me seems a shame. I would have thought that would have wanted to let thier fans have something more personal and although i know there is always the time factor there were some whos queues were limited and were still a bit blah at having thier photo taken. I know that if i go and see someone i would like to have a picture of them and myself. Or even just of them that I have taken, just as something to remember the day a bit better by.
Anyway, that is all i can really say as this was the first one i have been to properly - and loved every minute of it, even if it did seem as though there wasnt quite so much of a buzz in the atmosphere.
SG
Anna Paquin - Rogue - X-Men
Tom Welling - Clark Kent - Smallville
~~~~~~
Mutation - it is the key to our evolution.
It has enabled us to evolve from single celled organism
into the dominant species on the planet.
This process is slow and normally taking
thousands and thousands of years
But every few hundred millenia evolution leaps forth...
~~~~~~
MSN ~ Ardina@hotmail.co.uk
#9
Posted 06 October 2005 - 04:20 PM
nine times out of ten the photo rule is a personal preference of the guest and sm try to accomodate people the best they can. unfortunately its up to members of the crew to break the news to dissappointed fans and that is not an easy job at all. i hate doing it. but sometimes it has to be done.
=x=
"i couldnt leave him. not there!"
All was well.
=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=
#10 Guest_WaterBoy_*
Posted 06 October 2005 - 04:41 PM
Please can this topic be kep running, and possibly pinned. Its this kind of sensible discussion and feedback that can improve future shows.
Paul
#11
Posted 06 October 2005 - 04:50 PM
C7 was fun, had a lovley day but it didnt beat the first time
C8 was pretty much the same, great day, meet people etc but didn't have the spark any longer.
I know that I only come to these conventions with a very limited amount of money in my pocket but through going with friends (who have money) and getting my timing right and watching for dead or open ques I manage to meet a load of people. So i don't feel cheated out of money at all, I just feel like I've had a lovely day, with my friends and thats that
KIWI
24
Prison Break
PLEASE
#12
Posted 06 October 2005 - 05:11 PM
Presumably it must be known in advance what the guests (or agents?) preference is regarding photos - surely it's part of the contract? although it doesn't seem to apply to the press or SM's own photographer just as a point of order.
But anyway, could an icon or something be included on the main website page against the names to indicate if they will be allowing photos or not? Then for those people attending for whom getting a photo is important, they'd be better informed as to whether the guest they want to see will be allowing it or not and whether they want to attend - especially if travelling rather than only finding out when you join the queue.
It does seem that more and more are not allowing it which is a pity. I can understand no posed photos but taking one while in the queue or just to one side as you leave doesn't take long and doesn't really hold things up. Posed photos are nice but I'm personally just as happy to take a quick one while the guest is signing - it's something at least. And if flash is an issue, at least at MK it's often sunny enough for that not to be a major problem.
#13
Posted 06 October 2005 - 05:22 PM
#14
Posted 06 October 2005 - 05:24 PM
If they were to know beforehand then at least they would not feel let down on the day.
Anna Paquin - Rogue - X-Men
Tom Welling - Clark Kent - Smallville
~~~~~~
Mutation - it is the key to our evolution.
It has enabled us to evolve from single celled organism
into the dominant species on the planet.
This process is slow and normally taking
thousands and thousands of years
But every few hundred millenia evolution leaps forth...
~~~~~~
MSN ~ Ardina@hotmail.co.uk
#15
Posted 06 October 2005 - 05:30 PM
WaterBoy, on Oct 6 2005, 05:41 PM, said:
Well said. We are always looking to improve the service we provide and continuously try to work out what is feasable to implement to make the fans experience more memorable. We are always listening.
jason
www.collectormania.com
www.londonfilmandcomiccon.com
www.collectormaniaglasgow.co.uk
www.massiveevents.co.uk
#16
Posted 06 October 2005 - 05:33 PM
sugar_mouse, on Oct 6 2005, 06:11 PM, said:
But anyway, could an icon or something be included on the main website page against the names to indicate if they will be allowing photos or not? Then for those people attending for whom getting a photo is important, they'd be better informed as to whether the guest they want to see will be allowing it or not and whether they want to attend - especially if travelling rather than only finding out when you join the queue.
Unfortunately that is not always possible. Many guests start out the day doing photos and want to do photos but at the end of the day when they still have lots of people to get through and not much time they have to make a decision between meeting everyone or continuing to do photos. I know this happened with Andy Hallett. At the end of the day we made the decision to not allow photos for the last 100 people because he wanted the chance to talk to everyone and not have to just rush through. This meant the status of photos changed for some people whilst they were already in the queue. That's why it is often impossible to say weeks/days in advance when sometimes they don't even know minutes.
I do know how annoying it is as someone who doesn't care about the autograph and just goes for the photo and the chance to meet the guest. However, I can see it from the other side too as telling someone that time has run out and they've not yet met the guest they love is truely horrendous.
#17
Posted 06 October 2005 - 05:35 PM
If you see busy queues that are allowing photos, there'll be a crew member at the end of it that will get your camera ready and take your photo for you, so time isn't ALWAYS an issue.
It can be organised well so that even if the guest is busy, the photos can be managed so it doesn't cut into the numbers meeting the guest.
So it would seem that there's no real reason to cut photos out JUST due to timing constraints etc. It must be a personal preference, and so if it IS, then it probably would be possible to post the information beforehand.
Then again, this would just result in people complaining as usual, just like with prices etc. People will always complain regardless of when the information is given.
http://twitter.com/DavidBedwell
Long signatures mean you're going to Hell.
#18
Posted 06 October 2005 - 05:41 PM
#19
Posted 06 October 2005 - 05:50 PM
(1) Advertising guests - While it may hook people into buying party tickets, and that's a sensible selling technique, it's not gonna do any favours to get peoples hopes up and then NO ONE turns up. Don't put specific names, just generally say that some guests MAY attend if they choose. Have it as a nice surprise!
(2) Music - Don't ever have another live band. It's too specific, and doesn't fit a lot of tastes. At least then the DJ will have enough time to do a proper VARIED set and perhaps send more people home happy!
(3) Staff/Prices - I'm sure it's nothing to do with SMs themselves but there have been a lot of complaints about that so I'm not sure what can be done there ...
(4) Venue - If there IS another suitable venue then I'm sure it would have been used by now, so I think the stadium is the only place unfortunately, no matter how many people don't like it much.
I guess they're the main things. There seems to be more space outside so perhaps that could be used a bit more.
http://twitter.com/DavidBedwell
Long signatures mean you're going to Hell.
#20
Posted 06 October 2005 - 05:52 PM
Def never have a live band again.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











